(no subject)
Dec. 14th, 2006 11:35 amPhil should not read this.
The rest of you should consider it--Glenn Greenwald's column on the press and Ahmadinejad's recent 'Holocaust Convention'.
If for no other reason than when Greenwald says
That just isn't what "adversarial" means. An adversarial press does not mean that the media automatically and reflexively contradicts what the Government says or does. That is called being a mindless "contrarian," not "adversarial."
you can respond with a bold and immediate "No it isn't!"
The rest of you should consider it--Glenn Greenwald's column on the press and Ahmadinejad's recent 'Holocaust Convention'.
If for no other reason than when Greenwald says
That just isn't what "adversarial" means. An adversarial press does not mean that the media automatically and reflexively contradicts what the Government says or does. That is called being a mindless "contrarian," not "adversarial."
you can respond with a bold and immediate "No it isn't!"