cyrano: (Default)
[personal profile] cyrano
Have you signed the recall petition yet? Act now because time's running out.
First day at the new/old job; two days a week.

Another thing that's been bugging me. If G-Bu supports pre-emptive strikes to protect national security (Israel and the US are two that come to mind) How would he feel about Kim Jong Il exploding a nuclear device in Chicago to dissuade the US from its hostile overtures toward his nation? That's probably completely different.

Date: 2003-10-07 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] batratblue.livejournal.com
How would he feel about Kim Jong Il exploding a nuclear device in Chicago to dissuade the US from its hostile overtures toward his nation?

Not that that's a ridiculously biased tail on that question there or anything, but have you studied much about how North Korea has been handling this whole thing from the get-go last year? Or are you contenting yourself with what you're getting off the radio/TV/newsstand?

Regardless: A pre-emptive strike is a strike which destroys the retaliative capability or offensive capability of the target. Israel sees a bunch of tanks lining up on its border, they take them out before the Egyptian generals can shout 'charge'. That's pre-emptive. Likewise, their 1981 destruction of of the Osiraq reactor in Iraq was pre-emptive, given that it was a design explicitly purchased by the Iraqis because of its ability to act as a breeder for weapons-grade uranium. Likewise pre-emptive. Targeting training camps as well as the military and command structure of a nation that harbors and trains terrorists to attack your own nation before those terrorists can leave to strike, that's pre-emptive (and we're not the only nation to have ever done such a thing, nor is Afghanistan or Iraq the first time we have done such things.). The strike on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese was pre-emptive. It was designed to prevent our possible participation in the war by destroying our Pacific fleet in harbor (and it failed to do so). An attack on Chicago won't pre-empt anything except maybe a visit by the Chicago Metropolitan Opera or the Sox.

In point of fact, the only good pre-emptive target in the U.S., due to how widely distributed our military is, would be Washington...And even that wouldn't slow down the response significantly as our forces, and our infrastructure, are far too widely distributed. Mother Russia in her finest nuclar hour couldn't have managed a guaranteeable pre-emptive strike against us for this exact reason, while we had a much better shot at them because of their tendency to clump command and control centers and to have a highly inflexible military hierarchy with little individual command initiative.

Do a little homework about Kim Jong Il and his regime, sometime. You can hate Bush all you like without needing to cast totalitarian fascist dictators as if they were 'victimized innocents'.

Even if that is a popular tactic these days in some circles.

Poor Saddam!

Poor Uday and Qusay!

Poor Hitler!

That mean ol' U.S.!

Date: 2003-10-07 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyranocyrano.livejournal.com
You're right; if it hadn't been so early in the morning I'd have chosen someplace more military as a proper target. Possibly Moffet Field, or the Boeng plant in Seattle, or the Pentagon, or the terrorist training camp in Florida they call the College of the Americas. (My intelligence assures me they're very aggressive in their recruiting.)
However, do not assume that because I disagree with the 'Presumptive Strike' Doctrine that I think Kim Jong Il is at least as batshit crazy or downright evil as Saddam Hussein. What I am saying, instead, is that our President has said 'If you think somebody is going to attack you, you have the right and responsibility to attack them first'. Perhaps not in so many words, but in spirit and in substance. And I feel that this is not the best position to take on the national stage when so many people hate us.
And thank you for taking me to task in such a rational, intelligent, fully supported fashion.

Date: 2003-10-07 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyranocyrano.livejournal.com
do not assume that because I disagree with the 'Presumptive Strike' Doctrine that I think Kim Jong Il is at least as batshit crazy or downright evil as Saddam Hussein.
Rather, do not assume that I do not think.
This six-day week thing is going to get to me.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 11th, 2026 01:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios