Tersa pointed me in the direction of this article, which did wonders to warm and soften the hardened stony cold reaches of my sere and blasted heart.
Apparently, there's a group of investors that feels that David Souter's New Hampshire home would produce more revenue for the state if it were razed and turned into a hotel.
For those of you just joining us, Souter was one of the judges who joined the five-member majority in KELO et al. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON et al.
Apparently, there's a group of investors that feels that David Souter's New Hampshire home would produce more revenue for the state if it were razed and turned into a hotel.
For those of you just joining us, Souter was one of the judges who joined the five-member majority in KELO et al. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON et al.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 09:12 pm (UTC)That would be awesome. There's actually a lot of truth to the town's economic avantage, it would be a huge tourist draw. I'd go there and throw some money around town.
Too bad the city council will almost assuredly not go for it. And Souter might just offer up the house wihtout having to get all eminent domain on him. I think a few ridiculous-level cases are going to be needed before teh court sees fit to overturn its stupid decision. Punks.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-29 11:20 pm (UTC)