![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
cyranoSo Senator Stevens, at the urging of the FCC, has decided to have a hearing to investigate 'filth and smut on cable television'.
I have said this before, and now I will say it with a larger font in hopes that somebody will hear me.
The reason the FCC has jurisdiction over broadcast television is because it is *broadcast* over publically owned airwaves. The FCC was created to manage a public resource, in an attempt to prevent the 'tragedy of the commons' where unregulated use of a public resource leaves it unusable to anybody.
For those of us who were born prior to the Civil War and are confused by internal combustion engines, cable television does not use the public airwaves. The cable it runs on (although highly subsidized by the government) is not technically a public resource.
No matter how much Don Wildmon would like it to be so, the content of cable television broadcast is not a concern of the FCC. Plus, cable television is sort of... voluntary. If parents think that A&E is a liberal hotbed, or that the programming on ESPN is far too violent, or that the Food Network is showing too many bare breasts during the family hour (chicken breasts are very offensive), then they can opt for the broadcast channels or (GOD FORBID) not have a television.
Thank you.
Further whinging about the car cut for space considerations.
I have said this before, and now I will say it with a larger font in hopes that somebody will hear me.
The reason the FCC has jurisdiction over broadcast television is because it is *broadcast* over publically owned airwaves. The FCC was created to manage a public resource, in an attempt to prevent the 'tragedy of the commons' where unregulated use of a public resource leaves it unusable to anybody.
For those of us who were born prior to the Civil War and are confused by internal combustion engines, cable television does not use the public airwaves. The cable it runs on (although highly subsidized by the government) is not technically a public resource.
No matter how much Don Wildmon would like it to be so, the content of cable television broadcast is not a concern of the FCC. Plus, cable television is sort of... voluntary. If parents think that A&E is a liberal hotbed, or that the programming on ESPN is far too violent, or that the Food Network is showing too many bare breasts during the family hour (chicken breasts are very offensive), then they can opt for the broadcast channels or (GOD FORBID) not have a television.
Thank you.
Further whinging about the car cut for space considerations.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 02:29 am (UTC)Really why do I think this is just an excuse for a bunch of so-called "god-fearing" fundie congressmen to sit around, watch porn and choke their chicken? Then they'd make dyspeptic sounds and expressions whilst announcing that the material is filth, degrading and moreover, unpatriotic and they will do everything in their power to keep an eye on it (more wank sessions) and ensure other good "god-fearing" Americans aren't exposed to such pruirent filth.
Sometimes I wonder if they feel only congress should have access to porn, since they've already lost their souls. Then I realize that would be an altruistic agenda so it couldn't take place in congress. /sarcasm