cyrano: (Zik Zak)
[personal profile] cyrano
Just a quick note, here, as I'm seeing a lot of discussion on my flist about the new security measures at airports.
Airlines !== TSA
In fact, I would say that at base there is an antagonistic relationship between the two, because every new layer of security that the TSA establishes means fewer passengers, crankier passengers, and more difficulty getting to passengers, who then demand lower ticket prices in exchange for their inconvenience.
Yes, the airlines certainly can take steps (ones which cut into their already pretty thin baseline) to accomodate people who have been inconvenienced by the new security measures. But they're not the ones telling you to throw out your water bottle so that a third party can then charge you $5 for a replacement inside security.
(When Andale's or Boudin's sells you an overpriced meal, I as an airline employee do not in fact see any of that profit in my paycheck.)
Airlines already do enough stupid things and make enough arbitrary decisions that we don't need to add this in order to prove that they do stupid or arbitrary things. This has been your pedantic moment for the day.

Date: 2006-08-12 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phillipalden.livejournal.com
I hate to say it, but maybe we should start profiling a little. Differentiate between a lawyer from Northern California and a person with no clear purpose from countries that birth these types of acts.

How hard is it to look at background before we issue a visa and/or passport? There's no reason we cannot do simple background checks before the person shows up at the airport.

No tickets sold on demand, (but with an emergency provision.)

Flying is not a right guaranteed by the Constitution.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 01:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios