cyrano: (Network 23)
[personal profile] cyrano
And while I'm reading the paper, which is alternately full of stories about Nancy Pelosi and the 49ers, can somebody tell me why San Francisco should be desperate to hold onto a professional sports team?
It is my impression that (whatever it might have been like forty years ago) now a city makes millions or billions of dollars in concessions--through building new stadia or forfeiture of property taxes or any number of other toothsome bonuses--to a sport club or some other city makes those offers, and then the citizens end up footing a huge bill for what does not seem to me to be a good financial return.
Is it just the prestige of being able to say 'We host a professional sports team'? Or is there some hidden benefit that I'm not seeing here?

(As an aside, I am ambivalent. If the 49ers move to Santa Clara then we inherit all the traffic and chaos and stupid which I expect will bloat geometrically with the Great America traffic and chaos and stupid. If the 49ers stay in San Francisco then there's a chance we'll end up with the 2016 Olympics, and the traffic and the chaos and the stupid.)

Date: 2006-11-11 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] motleypolitico.livejournal.com
Yeah, mostly it's a theoretical argument of associated shopping centers and other projects that pull in sufficient sales and other corporate taxes to justify the outlay.

I think a large portion of it is political, given that losing/gaining a sports team makes politicians responsible look either very good or very bad, so I don't think it's economic, I think it's political.

As for the traffic, better the 49ers and ~10 days of stupid traffic, mostly on Sundays, rather than a baseball team there, with 80+ days of stupid traffic.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 11:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios