Recently a friend of mine and I were discussing movies, and attending the cinema, and I talked about how I didn't like to go, because people were impolite (talking, texting, rampant kids, etc) and I didn't enjoy the movie I was trying to watch. And she made the point that groups of people watching a comedy (the specific film in question was a funny movie, the ending especially so) enjoyed it more. The quote was "Comedy is better shared."
This inspired my usual "Why am I not like other people?" mastication. I know, from my theater experience, that a half empty house meant we'd be working twice as hard for half the response, and the basic theory was not in question. So I tried to go back and remember my responses to things I'd watched alone and with other people.
There was the disastrous "Austin Powers:International Man of Mystery" debacle, where I ended up watching it twice in one weekend with groups of people trying to share the comedy with me, because I was too timid to excuse myself and flee into the night. But I don't think that would have been any less funny watching it on my own. (I just would have turned it off sooner.)
Maybe I was just a misanthrope. God knows there's evidence for that. But would that excuse me from basic human psychology? I didn't think so.
Many times I have been reading and come across a particularly witty passage and laughed until the housemate demanded I share with her, but that came over poorly often enough that she's stopped doing that. A large portion of this reaction can be blamed on lack of context, I think.
When I first saw "Wazzup:Superfriends" I shared it with everybody who would hold still long enough. I think that increased my enjoyment of it. But I watched it 84 times that day on my own, so it's hard to tell for certain.
I suspect I'm just like all the other monkeys at the base. I'm just a snob.
And for those of you who read this far, I will say that the fucking cat just walked in my yogurt. I share this in the hopes that it will become comedy.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 04:24 pm (UTC)As far as the cats, I will leave it to my housemate to debate that. It may just be that they're Turks.
(Taking the test. My usual "Where is none of the above?" is rearing its head.)
Your result for The 3 Variable Funny Test ...the Wit
(57% dark, 23% spontaneous, 21% vulgar)
your humor style: CLEAN | COMPLEX | DARK
You like things edgy, subtle, and smart. I guess that means you're probably an intellectual, but don't take that to mean pretentious. You realize 'dumb' can be witty--after all isn't that the Simpsons' philosophy?--but rudeness for its own sake, 'gross-out' humor and most other things found in a fraternity leave you totally flat.
I guess you just have a more cerebral approach than most. You have the perfect mindset for a joke writer or staff writer.
Your sense of humor takes the most thought to appreciate, but it's also the best, in my opinion.
You probably loved the Office. Maybe I need to watch this again. It's another "I don't get it."
PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Jon Stewart - Woody Allen - Ricky Gervais
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 04:27 pm (UTC)Maybe I should rent the Hangover, then. And invite a lot of friends to watch it.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 04:46 pm (UTC)I like your over-analytical mind. It makes for chewy conversations that still have me working them over days later.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-17 07:33 pm (UTC)On the other hand, they also made me watch The Big Lebowski on the grounds that it was funny, and it wasn't.