Sometimes you don't have to read the article

[cyrano]

to know that it's going to piss you off.

I hope that Karen Salmansohn doesn't come off as too bitchy or strident or controlling or un-feminine as she explains the foundations of feminine-ism.
(I made it all the way to page two before I threw the laptop across the room in disgust.)

Comments

[motleypolitico.livejournal.com]

I made it to page one before the blithe toss-off remark told me the author wasn't worth another 4 pages worth of my time spent reading.

There are angry feminists, and there aren't. It's a bad stereotype to pay too much attention to it, IMHO. It's like assuming that anyone who has pride in their $group (religion, sex, ethnicity, etc.) necessarily has a negative connotation associated with it.

Sturgeon's Law applies here: 90% of everything is crap. I suspect he underestimated here, but there you go. Attention to personal appearance is a personal choice - why should I care or assign other attributes to such a choice? Maybe I'm just oversimplifying because I just don't give a shit - I treat people as individuals, rather than groups.